tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6672880129970799148.post6701291239383408794..comments2023-08-22T07:01:08.590-07:00Comments on Agent Intellect: Homophobia and RacismJim S.http://www.blogger.com/profile/15538540873375357030noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6672880129970799148.post-9420710572815743402009-05-05T07:02:00.000-07:002009-05-05T07:02:00.000-07:00interesting. i'm not sure if this is in the scope ...interesting. i'm not sure if this is in the scope of your thinking, but talk a little about redemption and sanctification of a homosexual person. for example, is it enough to say that the person asks the help of the holy spirit to merely *prevent* the practice of homosexual acts? or is there need for a *transformation* of homesexual to heterosexual attraction? take the case of "ordinary" sin like stealing. in that case, we can say that sanctification involves removal of the desire to steal because stealing is inherently wrong. if one was to say that the sanctification of a homosexual person necessitated the removal of that desire because it's also inherently evil, then isn't that condemnation in a different form? especially so since most modern homosexuals now believe it's not a (evil) choice but an orientation?<br /><br />thanks for a great read!Bipin Senhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04620931115465174916noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6672880129970799148.post-24742615285456255332009-04-25T17:53:00.000-07:002009-04-25T17:53:00.000-07:00Thank you very much for this post. We need to refo...Thank you very much for this post. We need to refocus the debate on the actions, not the people. It's not about whether people are right or wrong, but about whether the actions are right or wrong. No Chrisitans should be homophobes (that is, hate the persons), but we should oppose the acts.Tysonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03676262563581475175noreply@blogger.com