Bill Vallicella has a couple of great posts on the attempt to avoid eliminative materialism while still maintaining a reductive materialist stance.
His first post engages
Jaegwon Kim's
Physicalism, or Something Near Enough, a book I desperately want to read, and
his second post clarifies some issues. Good stuff.
Question from a non-philosophy person.
ReplyDeleteReductive materialist means that a person's state of being is just the sum of his or her material pieces.
But eliminating reductivism is means you can't trust your states of being?
I didn't understand that part.
Roughly, type physicalism says that certain experiences, like pain, will eventually be shown to be referring to a type of physical process in the brain, like the firing of C-fibers. So pain reduces to C-fibers firing.
ReplyDeleteEliminativism doesn't say that pain is the same thing as the firing of C-fibers, it says that there is no such thing as pain, only the firing of C-fibers. Nobody has ever been in pain, no one has ever experienced pain. All people have experienced is C-fibers firing.